Sunday, August 18, 2013

"Filtering" the Religions, Part 1


"Practically all religions and all philosophies have started ... by promising their adherents some such reward as immortality. No religion has failed hitherto by not promising enough; the present breaking up of all religions is due to the fact that people have asked to see the securities. Men have even renounced the important material advantages which a well-organized religion may confer upon a State, rather than acquiesce in fraud or falsehood, or even in any system which, if not proved guilty, is at least unable to demonstrate its innocence. Being more or less bankrupt, the best thing that we can do is to attack the problem afresh without preconceived ideas. Let us begin by doubting every statement. Let us find a way of subjecting every statement to the test of experiment. Is there any truth at all in the claims of various religions? Let us examine the question." - Aleister Crowley

The late Aleistar Crowley, an infamous occultist and drug addict, may seem an unlikely person to quote in opening a search for a higher authority But his point is sound: if indeed there is a "God" (I use this term generally to refer to any higher authority) who is attempting to get a message to us, is it not imperative that we investigate the matter to see if there is validity in any claims of such?
Religion is the term commonly used to describe the holistic grouping of ideas and institutions involving relations with a higher authority. It seems reasonable to think that if there is a God attempting to communicate with us that the message would be present in one or more of the religious systems. But which one(s)? How do we find the religion(s) with the message that could most reasonably be considered true?

The first step is relatively easy. Given the purpose of this blog to deduce a foundational charter upon which to act, we can develop some simple filtering criteria to whittle down our list to a manageable number of faiths (which can then be investigated in greater detail.)

Criteria #1 - Available
The first criteria is obviously that the message has to be available. If it is unknown, then we as humans could not justifiably be held accountable for acting contrarily. All available religious views can be roughly grouped into the following 18 categories, which represent our initial data set:

Christianity
Islam
Hinduism
Chinese Universalism
Buddhism
Ethnoreligionism
Neoreligionism
Sikhism
Judaism
Spiritism
Baha'ism
Confucianism
Jainism
Shintoism
Taoism
Zoroastrianism
Atheism
Agnosticism

Criteria #2 - Authoritative
Since we are concerning ourselves with the question of whether there is a "higher authority," any so-called "religions" which do not include a concept of a higher authority shall not be considered for the purpose of this search. The following views are eliminated accordingly:

Buddhism - Faith centered on the teaching of Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha) holding that life is full of suffering caused by desire. The way to end this suffering is through enlightenment that enables one to halt the endless sequence of births and deaths to which one is otherwise subject. Although spirit beings are present in the faith, there is no recognized higher authority to which humans are considered accountable.

Ethnoreligionism - This category is not a religion. Rather, it is a practice within many faiths that involves ethnicity being closely linked with the facets of the religion itself.

Neoreligionism - Also known as "New Age Spirituality." Like ethnoreligionism, neoreligionism is not a specific faith as much as it is a conglomerate of contemporary spiritual ideas. There is no commonly accepted higher authority.

Spiritism - Not considered a religion by adherents, spiritism is a pseudo-science dealing with the relationship between spiritual and physical beings.

Confucianism - A system of ethics, education, and statesmanship taught by Confucius and his disciples, stressing love for humanity, ancestor worship, reverence for parents, and harmony in thought and conduct. For all practical purposes, Confucianism is not a religion.

Jainism - A dualistic religion founded in the 6th century BC as a revolt against current Hinduism and emphasizing the perfectibility of human nature and liberation of the soul, especially through asceticism and nonviolence toward all living creatures. Holds that every soul is capable of divine perfect and infinite power. Accordingly, there is no hierarchical authority structure since all humans can be considered "gods".


-->Shintoism - The native religion of Japan, Shintoism is a faith centered on the worship of kami, which are spirits that are part of every living and non-living thing in the universe. Although some kami are considered greater than others (the sun goddess, Amaterasu, is regarded particularly highly), they are considered to exist inside our physical realm and, like humans, are imperfect and hold no particular authority.

Atheism - The belief that there is no God.

Agnosticism - Non religious.

Criteria #3 - Homogeneous
If a higher authority is indeed attempting to communicate with us, it follows that the message would likely be consistent and internally sound. I mentioned in the primer to this blog that pluralism/universalism (the belief that all faiths are true) is logically impossible. That being the case, then any religions which take an eclectic view of faith cannot be true. Philosopher and Christian apologist Ravi Zacharias says it best:

"Anyone who claims that all religions are the same betrays not only an ignorance of all religions but also a caricatured view of even the best-known ones."

The faiths that are filtered in this category are:

Hinduism
- A diverse body of religion, philosophy, and cultural practice native to and predominant in India, characterized by a belief in reincarnation and a supreme being of many forms and natures, by the view that opposing theories are aspects of one eternal truth, and by a desire for liberation from earthly evils. Belief in an authoritative entity is present in some circles; however, the pluralist views negate any proposed consequences.

Bahaism - a religion founded in Iran in 1863 by Husayn Ali (called Bahaullah) teaching the essential worth of all religions, the unity of all races, and the equality of the sexes. Although Baha'ism believes in an authoritative God, it also takes a syncretic views of religion.

Taoism - a popular Chinese religion/philosophical system advocating a life of simplicity and naturalness in order to attain harmony with the Tao. Originated with the teachings of Lao-tzu but later became highly eclectic and characterized by a patheon of many gods, and by the practice of alchemy, divination, and magic.

Chinese Universalism - a group of Chinese beliefs that is highly varied and primarily based on folklore and mythology.

to be continued...

2 comments:

Owen Gaines said...

Thanks for the provocative blog. A few thoughts as I read it (assuming you're after feedback):

I recently read an article (can't remember the name) that talked about religion as supernaturalism. While a simple idea, it gave me quite a bit to chew on. The title of this blog could be, "Filtering Supernaturalisms, Part 1."

I think it's worth mentioning the premises here seem to me:
1. There was(is) a higher authority(ies) who wants/wanted to communicate with humans.
2. This communication remains with us in some reliable form.

If you don't wish to tackle those (and ultimately I think they're crucial), I'm happy to read your blogs and assume those are true.

Sadly, I'm not sufficiently informed to validate your 18 categories. From flipping through some world religions books, your list seems sparse. However, I'm guessing your list hits the big ones at least and is a great start.

I understand you're tackling a specific question, "If there is a higher authority who wishes to give a message to humans, which supernatural philosophy is most likely true?" However, I think it's unfortunate to watch some philosophies like Buddhism disappear in Criteria #2. I imagine I feel this way because we leave a more general inquiry, "What is actual?", and toss out ideas based on the specificity of the question. I do wonder why you start with such a specific question and what you think you'll have at the end of the research. To me, it's akin to starting an inquiry of the shape of the earth:

"Assuming the earth is two dimensional, which is the most likely shape of the surface: a square, a rectangle, or a diamond? We throw out spherical because it doesn't fit the criteria of the question."

But...it's your blog, my man. And I'm along for the ride. :)

Criteria #3 has always had my attention. It seems madness for so many intelligent people to hold a position of logical impossibility, I often force myself to try to empathize. I wonder if my historical fundamentalism just doesn't allow me to see the "eclectic view of faith." I've had quite a few conversations now with people of this persuasion, and I'm still unsuccessful. More or less, "All these religions are pointing toward 'god', but humans have screwed things up." Just not adding up for me.

Looking forward to future entries...

zrated said...

i was certain that this post had been made several years ago, but maybe that was the sunday school lesson you taught that time.

i'm hoping that a dialog can develop between you and owen that i can listen in on. there have been some pretty major changes in my religious perspective over the last year or so and i'd like to see that conversation.